<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A kick in the shins of Christian &#8216;Internet Bloggers&#8217; too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sntjohnny.com/front/a-kick-in-the-shins-of-christian-internet-bloggers-too/67.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sntjohnny.com/front/a-kick-in-the-shins-of-christian-internet-bloggers-too/67.html</link>
	<description>The homepage for Anthony Horvath's defense of the Christian faith...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:21:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thom waters</title>
		<link>http://sntjohnny.com/front/a-kick-in-the-shins-of-christian-internet-bloggers-too/67.html/comment-page-1#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator>thom waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sntjohnny.com/front/archives/67#comment-1975</guid>
		<description>One of the great mistakes made by all parties, both those properly credentialed and those not so, is that they simply fail to read the documents before us.  Most people already have a particular hypothesis that they are seeking to verify or promote, and they look for &quot;evidence&quot; that they feel does that.  For example, when Mark records that Pilate was unbelieving to the death of Jesus, what might that suggest to us concerning both the type of scourging he actually received prior to the crucifixion and to the possibility that Jesus did not die on the cross as most believe.  Mind you, I&#039;m not here taking any position, I am simply reading the document and wondering how it might help to fill in any holes or questions we might have concerning what actually happened historically.  We would all do well just to read the documents without passion or prejudice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the great mistakes made by all parties, both those properly credentialed and those not so, is that they simply fail to read the documents before us.  Most people already have a particular hypothesis that they are seeking to verify or promote, and they look for &#8220;evidence&#8221; that they feel does that.  For example, when Mark records that Pilate was unbelieving to the death of Jesus, what might that suggest to us concerning both the type of scourging he actually received prior to the crucifixion and to the possibility that Jesus did not die on the cross as most believe.  Mind you, I&#8217;m not here taking any position, I am simply reading the document and wondering how it might help to fill in any holes or questions we might have concerning what actually happened historically.  We would all do well just to read the documents without passion or prejudice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Disappointing Attack Article by Richard Abanes &#124; Athanatos Christian Apologetics Ministry</title>
		<link>http://sntjohnny.com/front/a-kick-in-the-shins-of-christian-internet-bloggers-too/67.html/comment-page-1#comment-1795</link>
		<dc:creator>A Disappointing Attack Article by Richard Abanes &#124; Athanatos Christian Apologetics Ministry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sntjohnny.com/front/archives/67#comment-1795</guid>
		<description>[...] common in certain circles.  Academic circles are filled with it.   You find it among the &#8216;professionals.&#8217;  The argument seems to be that unless something comes out of scholarly &#8216;peer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] common in certain circles.  Academic circles are filled with it.   You find it among the &#8216;professionals.&#8217;  The argument seems to be that unless something comes out of scholarly &#8216;peer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sntjohnny.com &#8250; A Review of Lee Strobelâ€™s Soon to be Released â€œThe Case for The Real Jesus.â€</title>
		<link>http://sntjohnny.com/front/a-kick-in-the-shins-of-christian-internet-bloggers-too/67.html/comment-page-1#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>sntjohnny.com &#8250; A Review of Lee Strobelâ€™s Soon to be Released â€œThe Case for The Real Jesus.â€</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sntjohnny.com/front/archives/67#comment-82</guid>
		<description>[...] Post a Comment You must be logged in to post a comment.   &#8249; A kick in the shins of Christian &#8216;Internet Bloggers&#8217; too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post a Comment You must be logged in to post a comment.   &lsaquo; A kick in the shins of Christian &#8216;Internet Bloggers&#8217; too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
