Category: science

Open Letter to Everyone but Richard Dawkins

Never mind that Dawkins was rude. Was he wrong?

Share

Open Letter to Everyone But Richard Dawkins, Part Two

In the first part I sought to tease out the basis for Dawkins’ claim that what he said “follows logically from the ordinary pro-choice stance.” It is to the reader to decide if my analysis is correct, and if not, what the real basis is. It is important, however, to understand that Dawkins is not […]

Share

The Crux: It is about Sex at Any Price

No one wants to be told that they cannot play with their toy. No one wants to be told that their toy might even be dangerous in certain contexts–like the child that wishes to play baseball in the living room does not like being told to take the baseball bat and ball into the field, where that toy is more appropriate–or, that they shouldn’t bash people in the head with the baseball bat.

Share

Elliot Rodger–Would-be Modern Eugenicist

This excerpt from Elliot Rodger’s ‘manifesto’ is the product of a hyper-sexualized society that emphasizes ‘fairness’ and elevates the elimination of suffering as the highest moral good; his eugenic conclusions seem to follow logically.

Share

China is beating us at our own game; abortion is a population control measure, no more, no less

China is merely “beating us at our own game.” It was the US that first conceived of the ‘one child’ policy.

Share

The Ovens of our Era: More than One Way to Host a Holocaust

Today’s headline on the Drudge Report did not surprise me in the slightest: ABORTED BABIES INCINERATED TO HEAT HOSPITALS The article linked to is this one in the Telegraph: Aborted babies incinerated to heat UK hospitals: The remains of more than 15,000 babies were incinerated as ‘clinical waste’ by hospitals in Britain with some used […]

Share

Why Ken Ham should Not Debate Bill Nye

An interesting thing has happened, so rare it might even be deemed a singularity on par with the Big Bang: There will be a debate between a young earth creationist* and an avowed evolutionist. The debate, to be held on Feb. 4th, 2013, is between Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis and Bill Nye… the Science Guy. I attempted to get tickets; they were sold out within just a few minutes. This is indicative of the kind of interest there is in such an event. It is no doubt good publicity for the Creation Museum, but sitting here as a young earth creationist myself, I wish to lodge my (obviously belated) advice to Mr. Ham: cancel the debate.

Share
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 18 19 20 Next