Prince Caspian and Open Theism
Posted by Anthony on May 19, 2008
Some friends took issue with a statement by Aslan to the effect: “We can never know what would have happened.”
Aslan of course is a type of Christ. And Christ is God. The idea that God could not know what would have happened smacks a great deal of some modern trend in theology called ‘open theism.’
The book, however, has Aslan saying something quite different: “No one is told what would have happened.” In the same package of insight, Lewis shares through Aslan, “One is only told their own story.” [these are paraphrases]
That comment was the only one I saw in the movie that came across as ‘open theistic’ so I suppose that some writer moved to try to condense some narrative without giving thought to what they just said. There is a difference between the ideas. The Book Prince Caspian is rock orthodox solid. The other is experimental… and most likely will fall away as most ‘innovations’ in theology do.
There is some wiggle room here for the movie quote. Aslan is a type specifically of the second person of the Trinity and that person asserted that there were some things known only to the Father. The quote could be construed as an example of Aslan’s kenosis. That is me being generous.
Anyway, I just wanted to set the record straight. I got some search hits on open theism and Prince Caspian so I was prompted to speak on it. The book communicates the notion that another possible ‘future’ is not known to us and will not be told, but God knows it. The movie communicates the notion that even God doesn’t know it. When in doubt, the Book is authoritative.
I don’t suppose we can expect Walt Disney to get every nuance of theology dead on, but I don’t see why they couldn’t have just lifted the direct quote without modifying it.
My review of this movie is forthcoming.



























