web analytics

A Christian Reaction to ABC’s “V” Visitors

I am hoping that ABC’s “V” takes the place that Heroes formerly occupied before it jumped dozens of sharks.  It is too soon to be sure, but there is certainly promise.

The idea of space aliens coming to earth is something that this blog has explored previously.  For example, in this entry I argue that intelligent agents from outer space provide an interesting opportunity to test various world view hypotheses.  For example, years of movies and stories lead us to assume that an alien encounter would belong in just two possible classes:  1., the nasty creatures out to conquer us (Ie, “Independence Day” and of course “V.”)  2.  the creatures are super intelligent and benevolent to such an extent that they are, for all practical purposes, Divine (ie, “Contact.”)  In both scenarios, the atheistic evolutionary framework is presumed.  But what if alien contact yields a different result?  What if the aliens are mere creatures- but unfallen?  Or, what if they hold to a belief system identical to Christian theism?  That’d be interesting, eh?

While “V” does not appear to break this kind of innovative ground, it was a breath of fresh air to have one of the main characters be a Christian priest who is… wait for it… skeptical.  Christians are often portrayed as gullible or extremist whackos (see again, “Contact”) and your hard core evolutionary atheistic types are veritable bastions of cool headed logic and reason (see the TV show, “Bones.”)  (Yes, it’s true that one Christian in “Contact” was more reasonable, but he wasn’t exactly definitive about his beliefs, either).

The Christian priest in “V” issues forth a sermon that makes quite a bit of sense:  “Before you jump on the bandwagon, make sure it is sturdy enough to hold you.”  There is no atheistic foil in “V.”  Nonetheless, I am pretty sure that your hard core secular humanist would accept without question a message presented to them by aliens like those we see in “V.”  I know this because they already have.

I can’t believe that “V” is not deliberate commentary on the current political climate in America.  It is just too pointed to be coincidence.  But perhaps it is better to start at the beginning.

When the Visitors appear, they reveal their first message via… a television screen.   I cannot think of a better way to win the trust of the American population then to pop onto a screen and eloquently state something to the effect of, “We mean you no harm.  We’re awesome.  We like you.”

This is a population that believes practically anything that they see on a screen.  They are hyper-skeptical of anything written down and if its old, all the worse.  Clearly, nothing that ‘wandering nomads’ thousands of years ago wrote down can be believed… but if someone pops onto television and says [fill in the blank] it is instantly accepted.

Probably the biggest laugh I had was when the ‘journalist’ is invited to interview the Visitor and the Visitor insists that nothing be asked that paints them in a negative light.  The ‘journalist’ protests that it is journalism’s job to ask hard questions.  Really!  Since when?  But perhaps that is the joke of the scene:  the all powerful media brokers dictating terms to the ‘journalists.’

In the same interview, the Visitor announces the desire of the Visitors’ to offer medical assistance to all humans.  The ‘journalist’ is aghast, “You mean universal health care?”  The Visitor affirms this is exactly what they mean.  And of course, the Visitors seem to have going for them the fact that they can heal 65 human ailments.   Can anyone think of any other putative super intelligent entities who are surrounded by the ‘best and the brightest’ (read this ‘journalism’ carefully…) attempting to solve all the world’s social ills?

The Visitor comforts the journalist:  “Sometimes, change is difficult.”

You see why it is hard to escape the conclusion that the writers of “V” are trying to take jabs at the Obama administration.

To top it off, when the journalist leaves the mother ship, one of the Visitors comforts him for making the right decision:  “It was the right decision;  compromising one’s principles for the common good is the right thing to do.”

Saul Alinsky would be proud.

Now, the Visitors turn out to be- as we expected- lizardlike sentient agents who are cloaked in perfect human skin.  Despite the many similarities between the Obama administration and the Visitors, I for one am not persuaded that Obama is actually a lizard-man in disguise.  For one thing, the Visitors turn out by the end of the show to be some pretty tough cookies that can handle themselves in a fist fight.  Obama can’t get a pitch over the plate without bouncing it over and if I recall correctly, he bowled a scant 37 in his attempt to appear like EveryMan.  I’m pretty sure rumors about his ability on the basketball court are highly overrated, but I’ve seen a lot of scrawny folks manage to sink a three pointer consistently, so who knows.

Of course, this could all be a charade, and in fact Obama is a lizardman who has wisely concealed his true physical strength.

The reader might be objecting at what seems to be a cheap shot.  It is not so:  I perceive Obama to be an ‘intellectual’ type who probably hasn’t done a day’s hard labor in his life.   I have great difficulty believing that the man can relate to the real challenges of the ‘working man’ he is portrayed as working for.  But I digress.

The Visitors portray a socialistic ideal that is virtually identical- in both content and in jargon- to the ideal presented to us by our Glorious Leaders.  While I confess I get a kick out of that, I’m not sure if that will be able to hold me through the whole series.  I hope that I see some metaphysical conversation.  The series seems to be well positioned for that already by having characters who are explicitly Christian that are both skeptical and ‘adoring.’

But if it turns out to be a simple story of revolution against hope-mongering tyrants ‘who know best’ I probably will stick around, anyway.  One hopes that our reality doesn’t mirror the social commentary too much- rather than a resistance movement, perhaps just an election will fix things.

One can hope- but if the man and his inner circle do end up wearing human skins that conceal an inhuman core- perhaps things may be different.  That may seem an over reach, but when you’ve had such pathetic journalism for however many years, you can’t hardly trust anything people say anymore.  You can only trust what they do, and that is what need to be watching now.

Watch this space for another reaction next week!  And remember:  compromising your principles is the right thing to do if it is for the common good!  And don’t you care about the common good?



1 ping

    • Josh on April 20, 2010 at 8:25 pm

    Sir, a few things.

    1. to the most “secular humanist” aliens visiting would not be considered an argument for or against theism considering the mistake of the original Christian solar system didn’t convince Christians of the powerful illusion of words then why would aliens? The atheists would say “see the universe isn’t made for humans” or they might say “see life evolved!” and the theists would respond “God made those too,” or “they are demons!” . . either way it would have no effect on the faithful. Even if every planet in the universe were covered to the brim with humans it would not help answer the reciprocal questions theism and atheism ask of each other.

    2.You criticize people for “believing everything they see on a screen.,” but sir, I’m frightened for your mind and followers that you don’t see the hypocrisy here. They DON’T believe everything they see on the screen, and if you think they do, you’re right to think they shouldn’t. They shouldn’t believe everything they READ too. From this I’m only gently proposing that believing that the Bible depicts reality is analogous in most every way to believing that the show V depicts reality. . . Which no body does.

    3. Lastly, Obama is a black man, he wears Fedoras like a black man, he SHOOTS HOOPS like a black man, smokes cigarettes and likes hip-hop. It is ridiculous that you would judge him upon his BASEBALL and BOWLING SKILLS. Put him on the free-throw line and you’ve got a show.

    To finish you seem to be that man on the three-point line who keeps shooting and missing but thinks he hears a “swoosh” each time.

    • Anthony on April 20, 2010 at 9:22 pm

    Hi Josh,

    I don’t know what to say, friend. Perhaps you are not familiar with the genre my post embodied. But I shall tend to your comments anyway.

    “to the most “secular humanist” aliens visiting would not be considered an argument for or against theism”

    If I understand this sentence (which seems to be missing a word or two), this is factually incorrect. I already gave examples and more examples could be multiplied. Sagan’s “Contact.” Dawkins has said that the first thing space aliens will ask us is “Have they discovered evolution yet?” The atheistic outlook is always assumed when we talk about potential alien encounters.

    Your point number 2 is not clearly written so I hope I get your meaning right, here. Feel free to explain your true intent if I miss your point.

    So, it is positively ridiculous to draw from my post the assessment that I was saying that “V” is that which people will believe is real just because it was on TV. You’re really stretching on this, and your inference here is the clearest sign that you failed to comprehend what I wrote.

    It is simply a fact of our times that people tend to have their beliefs shaped by what they see on a screen more than they are shaped by what they read. Again, examples could be multiplied.

    The real point is one of epistemology. Is what is seen in a 30 second commercial trustworthy? What about an article in the newspaper? In either case, we need to be discerning. I can only be accused of espousing hypocrisy if I suggest that we should mindlessly believe whatever we read, in the Bible or out. And I am espousing nothing of the sort.

    Regarding #3, I really had to ponder whether or not I should edit or delete your comment. It was blatantly racist and really inappropriate in polite company. You will note that at no point in my post did I reference Obama’s race. I would not be so rude to try to explain away Obama’s wussiness vis a vis his bowling and baseball skills just because he is black. Honestly, you should be ashamed of yourself. But I will address your racist remarks anyway.

    First of all, it would seem that the evidence is quite good that black people are fine athletes in many other sports than basketball and baseball I’m pretty sure is well represented. However, I am skeptical that a person who cannot put a little baseball over the plate with any kind of aim or power is a very good baller. I’ve only seen him play basketball against kids. Personally, I doubt he’s very good even at basketball. However, even here it seems as though you didn’t read what I wrote, since I clearly said:

    I’m pretty sure rumors about his ability on the basketball court are highly overrated, but I’ve seen a lot of scrawny folks manage to sink a three pointer consistently, so who knows.

    So, your comment about him hitting a three pointer is a little late. I already anticipated the possibility that he isn’t talentless. I’m just skeptical.

    It might be worthwhile to mention that I am a wrestler, and wrestlers have a natural contempt for basketball players. 🙂

    At any rate, I think it is very sad that you had to play the race card to try to buff Obama up. As near as I can tell, there are lots of very good black athletes (if we must talk about race) in baseball, football, track, etc. Probably, your average black man would have no trouble getting an 8 pound bowling ball down the lane, either.

    Actually, your average 12 year old girl could do it, too. But then, I suppose now you’ll say I’m being sexist. 😉

    • skelter79 on January 31, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    And that’s exactly what is happening now with that UN/Share-International’s Maitreya, the so-called ‘messiah’, ‘world teacher’ and ‘saviour’ supposedly together with his alien fellowship. And they’re already beginning to introduce him to the people through North American TV.


    Xtians have no doubt he is ‘the antichrist’. Good stuff he is not, considering where he’s coming from, that big joke.

  1. […] my previous post on the “V” series, I hoped that I would see some metaphysical conversation.  Perhaps its too early in the series, […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

seven − six =