web analytics

Christians Should Not Use the Government to Do THEIR Good Deeds

About 1700 years ago, a certain Roman emperor by the name of Julian the Apostate reigned.  He was called the ‘Apostate’ because of his fierce rejection of Christianity and his sometimes brutal attempt to repress it.  Julian was smart.  He knew that he could not just eradicate Christianity without dealing with the things that made it attractive.  He complained:

Whilst the pagan priests neglect the poor, the hated Galileans devote themselves to works of charity, and by a display of false compassion have established and given effect to their pernicious errors. See their love-feasts, and their tables spread for the indigent. Such practice is common among them, and causes a contempt for our gods.

In response, Julian The Apostate launched government philanthropic programs in an attempt to render the Christian message impotent.

The astute Christian reader will already see where this is going.   We must ask the question:  “Do the numerous government programs aimed at ‘helping’ people actually serve to undermine the Christian faith?”  Some might argue that that is too conspiratorial.  Let us set aside the question of intent then and deal strictly with the question of effect.

In doing this, we might approach a question like government funded welfare not by saying, “This was meant to undermine the Church” but instead by saying, “Whatever its intent, does it undermine the Church?”   I would answer the latter resoundingly as a ‘YES!’

For the great many Christians that vote Democratic and have over the decades such a determination probably comes across as a slap in the face.  Christians who vote Democratic tend to have genuine concern for the oppressed, the poor, and the desperate.   Do we suppose that the Christians during Julian the Apostate’s reign cared any less?  So what would be the difference?

The difference is clear:  the Christians then used their own money, their own resources, and their own time to help the poor.  They did not relegate the duties clearly given to them by God to the government.  And lucky thing, too, for Julian would have been happy to take on the task.  No happier, I suppose, then the Democrat party is today.

I note again that these duties were given to the Church by God.  I trust that I do not need to document this but for example, when the early church was getting ‘bogged down’ with ministering to the poor they didn’t ring up the leaders of Jerusalem to take over the task.  They appointed seven godly men from within to take over.  (Acts 6)

A sincere Christian might protest that it should make no difference who is helping the poor so long as they are being helped.  Wrong.   It makes a huge difference.

Consider this one very big difference:  the good deeds done by the Church are accomplished by men and women freely giving up their own time, talents, and money;  the ‘good’ deeds done by the Government which accomplishes the deed by coercing, by threat of fines, confiscation, and imprisonment, resources from the community.

More succinctly:  The Christian Church gives away was was freely given to begin with.  The Government gives away what was forcibly taken.

This is all the difference in the world.

From the outset, then, we see that there is no way that ‘helping the poor’ is the same no matter who does it.  The Government achieves it by robbing the rich(er).  The Church achieves it by the rich(er) joyfully responding to God’s work on their behalf.

There are many other differences, too.  For example, the Christian who cares about the poor and believes that the Democrats  can help might disagree with the liberals that subsidizing abortion on demand helps the poor.

Too bad!  Live by the Government, Die by the Government.  You opted to use the Government to do ‘good’ and that’s exactly what it did- ‘good’ as it perceives it.  Guess what.  Your hard earned dollars are now subsidizing the murder of thousands and millions of the unborn.  Oops.

Well, what did you expect to happen?  Did you think that the Government was going to be filled forever with stout Christians?  Hey, don’t let it bother you too much.  Besides subsidizing abortion, you’re also paying your ‘fair share’ for embryonic stem cell research, eugenics, euthanasia, condoms, etc, etc.  This is your bed you made.  Lie in it.

I would like to briefly deal with one likely objection:  “But the Government must help people because clearly the need is there and the Church is not stepping up.  It is better for these people to receive flawed help then no help at all.”

Setting aside the problem that in America, the kind of help the government often envisions  is EVIL, we find ourselves returning to the issues raised by my citation of Julian the Apostate.  If the Church today was doing its duty, there would be no room for the argument that the secular, humanistic, godless, liberal Government needs to be doing it.  What Julian had hoped to achieve has been accomplished in our age, with Christians complicit in the affair.

But here is the rub:  has the involvement and support of the Democrat party by so many Christians over the decades improved the reputation of the Gospel and Christians?  Nope.  Ostensibly, supporting these social causes were a manifestation of the Gospel but in fact the effect was to undermine the power and witness of the Gospel.

No other consequence should have been expected.  Who needs the Gospel when you have the Government?  And why should you believe the Gospel when all the Christians you know seem to be stingy and just as worldly as anyone else?  It isn’t like Christians are paying more taxes then anyone else, right?  Christian Bob and Secular Joe, living on the same street, are paying the same ‘fair share’ of taxes to support the same government programs.  How can we distinguish between their respective ideologies?

You can’t.

It seems like the very opposite of compassion, but Christians need to extract themselves from this vicious cycle of using the Government as the tool to ostensibly carry out the duties that belong to them.  This is not a call for being dismissive regarding social issues.  It is a call to meet them on our own terms.



6 pings

    • Chuck on July 6, 2009 at 11:05 am

    Very good, Tony.

    • JR on December 25, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    Excellent, and if I may add one thing:

    Think of the physically poor as Jesus spoke of them: dying of hunger, thirst, exposure and with no one to preach the Gospel to them (or give them any oportunity at education)

    Now look at the “poor” in developed countries like the USA. they die of OBESITY, not hunger, ALCOHOLISM and other drugs, with clean water for free at every faucet, they die in air conditioned housing with elevator access, and they are offered not only the Gospel, but free compulsory education from the age of 4 to the aulthood. And even after high school, besides the many public libraries with free internet and so, no one can even count all the programs that offer them free education in almost any area throught their life.

    Who exactly should be blamed for the large majority of the poor who use the free food and money to kill themselves? Who is at fault but the poor themselves who use 12+ years of schooling to make drug contact, have children out of wedlock and do anything at all BUT learn?

    Illegal aliens and possibly migrant farm workers aside, I do do not believe there are any monetarily poor people in the USA legally.

    I was homeless in the USA in 1966 at the age of 9. I KNOW hunger, eating from dumpsters and sleeping in a “boiler room”. I never took any govt help, not even a student loan. Our family struggled to get to where we are at, and I THANK GOD for the OPPORTUNITY to succeed the USA afforded us. Now, I am told that my $239K income makes me evil, that my COMTEMPT for the bum who CHOOSES to be homeless despite every opportunity is heartless.

    Crap. The only “poor” in the USA are those who choose to remain “poor” so they can continue self-destruction.

    I have NO problem accepting back a :younger brother” who may have spent his inheritance on self-destruction. Yes, it is time to party when someone REPENTS.

    What I have a problem is when my “Father-Government” takes my money from my wallet and mails it to my younger brother so he can more rapidly destroy himself.

    The Gospel preached today from is “continue just as you are and be saved”. Half a Gospel is no Gospel not at all, just as half the Truth is the most damnable of lies.

    And the Church is complicit in it’s own destruction.


    • Anthony on January 1, 2010 at 10:49 am

    Hi JR, thanks for your comment. You provided some good insights that I hadn’t thought about before. It’s the Law of unintended consequences writ large.

  1. […] led me to take a detour and cover some preliminary ground.  The original post was titled ‘The Christian Church shouldn’t use the Government to do THEIR good deeds.’  I posted it to my blog but it received attention and criticism on my facebook […]

  2. […] Recently, I wrote a post calling on Christians to step up to their own obligations and not delegate them to others, in particular to the government.  A couple of months ago I wrote a post drawing the connection between taxation and freedom. The first post and today’s are directed ONLY to Christians and should be read in that context.  I submit that the two posts above be read in conjunction with this one in order to better grasp my points. […]

  3. […] saying as much, I was defriended on Facebook by a prominent, conservative,  Christian.   I suppose my position […]

  4. […] It is entirely possible that this de-spiritualization is one of the chief goals of the statists to begin with when they do ‘good deeds,’ which I discuss here. […]

  5. […] it has been the Church at the forefront in doing good works.  For example, Julian the Apostate in the fourth century realized that if he didn’t enact government programs to take care of […]

  6. […] So, I asked him if he had heard of Julian the Apostate.  I was pleased to hear that he had, which is itself somewhat rare in the Church, but sad that he was not aware, or had not yet related the significance of Julian’s approach, to Christian charity.  Julian complained: […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

12 − 7 =