Posts Tagged by gay marriage
Dorothy Sayers on Gay Marriage? The Other Six Deadly Sins
| March 28, 2013 | Posted by Anthony under abortion, apologetics, atheism, Blog, Christianity and Culture, End Times, Love, marriage, morality, Secular Humanism, theology |
This is a warning against putting one’s trust in any child of man–particularly in Caesar. If the Church is to continue her campaign against lust, she must do so on her own–that is, on sacramental–grounds; and she will have to do it, if not in defiance of Caesar, at least without his assistance.
Gay Marriage One more Piece of the Progressive’s Social Engineered Rube Goldberg Machine
| March 27, 2013 | Posted by Anthony under abortion, Blog, Christianity and Culture, homosexuality, manhood, marriage, morality, Obama, politics |
Do you know what a Rube Goldberg machine is? Here are some pictures if you don’t. It’s an elaborate machine composed of unnecessary parts that requires an extraordinary amount of tinkering to get working correctly. Rube Goldberg machines are really fun to play with, but only on the principle that “It’s all fun and games…
The Jaffe Memo – Part 6; EVERYTHING is Now Political
| December 26, 2011 | Posted by Anthony under Blog, General |
In Part 5, I concluded that something very significant has happened over the last three decades: ‘politics’ has become all-encompassing. In short: everything has become political. And if everything has become political, and Christians are supposed to butt out, that means that the Christian is being asked (or told) that he can have absolutely no…
Christianity and Libertarians, the Republic, and the Consent of the Governed
| July 29, 2011 | Posted by Anthony under atheism, Blog, Christianity and Culture, End Times, family, General, Global Warming, homosexuality, human rights, morality, Obama, politics, Secular Humanism, theology |
This is why I led off with the John Adams quote. ‘Moral and religious people’ will continue to be ‘moral and religious’ whatever freedoms or restrictions are placed on them by the government. I might say: “Libertarianism was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the [government] of any other.” There are any number of forms of government that can work with a ‘moral and religious people.’ For an amoral or immoral or anti-moral or non-religious or anti-religious people, no kind of government is going to work for the long haul.
News Flash: Boys have Penises, Girls have Vaginas / Contra Feminism
| May 24, 2011 | Posted by Anthony under apologetics, atheism, Blog, evolution, family, General, homosexuality, human rights, Love, morality, pro-life, Secular Humanism |
That’s really what you have going on here… you know, the old “A rose by any other name is still a rose” thing… a boy is still a boy by any other name, and likewise a girl… but you have some people who think that by throwing off definitions you can obliterate, change, or deny the underlying reality. Are there sometimes when definitions can be unhelpful? Sure, I can buy that. But there are limits to that observation. This is secularism: taking an observation into account but jettisoning the limits or notion of limits.
I’ve changed my mind on gay marriage
| January 15, 2011 | Posted by Anthony under Blog, homosexuality, human rights |
I saw a couple of hits on a blog entry I wrote in March of 2010. The gist of it is that I mocked the notion that the state has no business deciding who should marry. I just looked at the entry again and have found my facetious arguments compelling. * A little toaster love…
Questions for Pillow-Marriage Advocates
| March 11, 2010 | Posted by Anthony under apologetics, Blog, Christianity and Culture, General, human rights, morality, Secular Humanism |
In my last entry I felt compelled to clarify that I was married- and that, to a woman, and not a pillow.
I felt this need because of this article I just read talking about a guy in Korea marrying… well, a pillow.
Far be it from me to prohibit anyone from living out the rest of their lives in a committed, monogamous relationship. But I do have some questions.
Q. Does the pillow consent? If consent is no longer one of the important elements constituting real ‘marriage’ where does it end? Will people be marrying shoes next? If shoes, why not toddlers? [More...]
Q. Obviously, with all of the kids needing loving parents these days it would be abhorrent to not allow this loving couple to adopt children. But I am curious to know… if the guy dies, does custody revert to the pillow? Who gets his assets?
This is the default footer layout. You can easily add or remove columns in the footer.
Recent Comments