• Welcome to Anthony Horvath's (aka Sntjohnny) Christian Apologetics Page

    Support Sntjohnny.com Just by Searching the Web!

    GoodSearch: You Search...We Give!

    Anthony's Book, Fidelis was reviewed on WorldnetDaily.com!

    Worldnetdaily logo

    Horvath's Book:
    "Fidelis"
    at birthpangs.com

    Click Here to Read my Blog
    Sign up for Anthony's Apologetics Newsletter (2-4 times a month).
    Anthony's Faith Statement.
    Discussion Forum
    Anthony in the media

    Horvath's "His Dark Materials" Parent's Guide and Apologetics Bulletin Insert.

    schipretreat While studying to be a pastor in college I abandoned my faith. In fact, I abandoned everything I thought I believed and rebuilt.

    To my own surprise at the time, I found that Christianity was much stronger than I had thought. As I rebuilt my belief system, I realized that there needed to be people out there responding to the questions people have. I had them myself. So, while not continuing on to be a pastor, I have focused on educating people about what Christianity is all about and responding to the various charges and accusations made against it.

    gradspeech

    There are some obvious challenges to being successful in that capacity, but a big part of it consists not in arguing with atheists and skeptics, but rather in providing Christians with accurate information in the first place to prevent them from leaving the faith in the first place.

    Questioning is a very normal and natural part of growing up, and I am convinced that it is not wrong to ask questions of God at any age. God doesn't strike people down. On the other hand, if people are going to reject Christianity, it is my aim to at least make sure they reject the real Christianity and not a false view of it. Also, much heartache can be avoided by educating Christians properly to begin with. My experience has helped me... but it was unnecessary.

    Paul said that some plant, some water, and others reap the increase. My job is to go out into the land and move rocks- or break them if necessary- till the land, and struggle through knee deep fertilizer... all in the effort to allow those who come later to plant, water, and reap the harvest.

    I look forward to the prospects of either serving you as someone who needs to haul rocks out of the field, or as someone who can look at the field, detect problems, and help farmers more effectively plant, water, and reap.
  • The 'Trailer' to Horvath's book, Fidelis (watch at Youtube)

    Here Begins my Blog

On Being a Stay at Home Dad: Reflections on Todd and Sarah Palin

September 5, 2008 – 12:09 pm by sntjohnny. Filed Under Blog, General.

The nomination of Sarah Palin raised all sorts of interesting issues and one that I found interesting was the role of her husband, Todd.  There are some similarities between he and I.  He had five kids, we have four.  His wife works, as does mine.  Our youngest child has special needs just like theirs is.  It sounds like they’ve got a bit more flexibility than we have got and it sounds like Todd has a seasonal job, too.  Still, as I watched this family I felt that they reflected reality as I experience it and as more and more people experience it.

I also happened to see feminist Gloria Steinem’s rejection of Sarah Palin’s brand of feminism and the essay includes this quote:

… American women, who suffer more because of having two full-time jobs than from any other single injustice, finally have support on a national stage from male leaders who know that women can’t be equal outside the home until men are equal in it.

I know that sounds like Gloria is being positive but in fact she isn’t.  You’d have to read the whole article to see that she’s just trying to make lemonade out of lemons.  Keeping in mind the Palins together with Gloria’s feminist credo, allow me to make a few comments.

As a man who is ‘equal inside the home’ let me say that this potentially is a lot of nonsense.  It is not infrequent that I struggle with the fact that my wife is the ‘breadwinner’ and I am not.  We hear about women struggling with their instinctive desire to stay home (which my wife has) while wanting to pursue their career (which my wife couldn’t care less about) but stay at home dads have a different tension.  They don’t have this instinctive drive to stay home, to be the nurturer, and even if society didn’t whisper under its breath that stay at home dads were losers, the men themselves sense it themselves.  At least, that is the case for me and for the handful of other stay at home dads I’ve spoken with. Read the rest of this entry »

To read the comments on this entry or post one of your own go to the Comment Forum.

Abortion, politics, apologetics: Observations on the conservative and liberal cultures

September 2, 2008 – 11:52 am by sntjohnny. Filed Under Blog, General, abortion.

The nomination of Sarah Palin has brought the abortion issue front and center.  She did so by putting her money where her mouth was:  knowing she was going to have a handicapped child but choosing to carry it to term, anyway.  We know that her family shares the same values:  her daughter is pregnant, but she too will carry the child to term.   So abortion is coming back into the debate but because of the utter commitment to life reflected in the Palin family.

In the Palins, principle lives in action.

It is good that the subject is coming up again.  Some 40,000,000 infants (in liberalspeak: globs of cells) have died in the US alone since Roe vs. Wade.  The Holocaust had some six million Jews and many others:  the old, the infirm, the mentally ill, gypsies, etc.  If in fact these 40,000,000 infants are really persons then it is a holocaust on such a scale that even the word ‘holocaust’ doesn’t capture the truth.  And this, not done by racist fascist Nazis, but right here in the good ol’ land of the free and home of the brave.

There is no dispute here that life begins at conception.  The philosophical question has to do with when we believe that the entity is a person, and consequently entitled to the rights we ascribe to persons.  There is no non-arbitrary objective measure other than conception by which to say “before there wasn’t, but now there is.”  There is no place in the stages of pregnancy where one can say “Aha!  Now it is a person!” The next non-arbitrary, objective measure, is birth itself.

(Note:  by pointing out that conception is non-arbitrary and objective and no other alternative exists (except birth itself) I have not yet invoked a religious argument.)

The question is how we might convince someone who finds it difficult to ascribe the rights and privileges of personhood to something that does not yet look like a person (as we are accustomed to seeing them) to begin doing so. Read the rest of this entry »

To read the comments on this entry or post one of your own go to the Comment Forum.

One Conservative Reaction to News that Sarah Palin’s Daughter is Pregnant: What would Obama Think?

September 1, 2008 – 7:45 pm by sntjohnny. Filed Under Blog, General, abortion.

It is a good thing that McCain and Palin didn’t attempt to hide the fact that Sarah’s daughter, Bristol, is pregnant.  I wouldn’t dare try to attempt a chronology, but it sure seemed like Palin pre-empted the liberal mudslinging in getting out the truth.  Or didn’t you know that the left has been trying to say that Sarah’s newborn child, the one with Downs Syndrome, is the baby that is actually Bristol’s?  I don’t know the background of this particular blog but it seems to explain the rumors on that point well enough.  If that wasn’t bad enough, while simultaneously suggesting that the baby is actually Bristol’s and not Sarah’s, the left has folks out there (Alan Colmes) saying that the newborn’s Downs Syndrome is Sarah’s fault for not getting proper pre-natal care.

Now, that argument alone needs a thumping but I’m not going to dish it out right now.

Anyway, should this matter?  Should this make conservatives think twice?  Already the blogosphere is ringing with the insinuation that a pregnant daughter somehow discredits or undermines the parents’ moral platform.  The left is all a titter about a young couple engaging in the behavior that the left itself is hellbent on promoting, except the whole ‘keeping the baby’ part.   I suppose some more measured voices on the left will be content so long as it was Bristol’s own choice to keep the baby, but there will be others on the left that believe that Bristol is ruining her life.  There will be some on the left that believe that this is the worst thing in the world that could happen to a young teenager girl.

In fact, there are some people that believe that actually carrying the baby to term would be a punishment.

In fact, such a person is running for president.  His name is Barack Obama:

When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education, which should include — which should include abstinence education and teaching the children — teaching children, you know, that sex is not something casual. But it should also include — it should also include other, you know, information about contraception because, look, I’ve got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old, I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby,

http://lifenews.com/nat3827.html

Ok, so a baby isn’t a consequence, it is a punishment.  Got it. Read the rest of this entry »

To read the comments on this entry or post one of your own go to the Comment Forum.

Christian Fiction Update of the Birth Pangs Series, what is Spero About? Review Copies Available

August 29, 2008 – 11:44 pm by sntjohnny. Filed Under Blog, Christian Short Stories, General.

Book 2 of my Birth Pangs series is due to be released on October 20th, 2008, in hard cover.  The name:  Spero.  I am very pleased to be able to release the cover image, designed by my friends at SojournerDesign.  Check it out.

The Birth Pangs website has had a make over, again with the help of SojournerDesign.  Take a look at www.birthpangs.com.  It still has a couple of rough edges but it is coming along nicely.  Just a note:  right now I am offering copies of both Fidelis and Spero available at a discount in celebration of the release of Spero.  To get it at the cheaper rate you need to make your purchase or pre-purchase now.  That offer expires Sept. 7th, 2008.

I haven’t talked much about what Spero is actually about.  Let me say a few words now.

Spero is Latin for “I Hope” though for all I care you can just think of it as ‘hope.’  If you’re astue, you’ll catch that ‘Fidelis’ has something to do with ‘faith.’  Put it together, Faith, Hope, and…. the name of book three will have something to do with Love.  :)

The Birth Pangs series is set in the United States some time in the not too distant future.  A small scale nuclear holocaust has taken place, followed by a devastating pandemic.  The United States had been defeated in several humiliating wars, but now all oppressors are gone, basically leaving a state of anarchy.  Fidelis charted the course of one character across this landscape.  Spero will chart the course of another character.  As you may guess, if the first book took ‘faith’ as one of its primary themes, Spero will take ‘hope’ as one of its primary themes.

Some other themes/events/issues besides ‘hope’ in Spero:

  • Courage, Compassion, and Loyalty
  • Adolescence
  • Father/Son/Masculinity
  • Sexual Purity
  • Good and Evil
  • Namehood
  • Worldview/Ideology/Politics
  • Ruminations on the Nature of Reality and Truth
  • Coincidence and Predestination
  • and a bunch of other stuff.

I would invite you to read the extended excerpt of Spero, which you may download in PDF by clicking that link.

Finally,  spread the word.  The Facebook group for it is located here.  I have a couple of review copies available for the worthy blogger.  Contact me with your pitch and get yourself an advanced copy.

To read the comments on this entry or post one of your own go to the Comment Forum.

Democrats Deprived of Historical Moment, McCain Wins Christian Conservatives, McCain wins ME

August 29, 2008 – 3:53 pm by sntjohnny. Filed Under Blog, General.

By now I’m sure everyone has heard that McCain has selected Sarah Palin, the governor of Alaska, to be his vice-presidential candidate.  The strategic victory that this represents is clear to most, especially when compared to the Obama campaign.  The Obama campaign was about ‘change’ and a ‘moment of history’ but when the chips were down picked a VP that was old school.  Not that I blame him for not picking Hillary to be his running mate, but not doing so certainly watered down the mission for ‘change.’  With the Palin pick, conservatives are able to provide something ‘historic’ in their own right.  Whether or not former Hillary supporters (or Hillary herself!) are willing to vote McCain-Palin or not I don’t know, but the point is that the ‘historical’ aspect is no longer on one side of the aisle.

I think credit has to be given to McCain for being willing to suck it up and listen to his base.   McCain’s annoyance with the so-called ‘Christian Right’ is well known and the annoyance has been reciprocated, illustrated for example by James Dobson saying he would not vote for McCain.  I believe the tide changed in McCain’s mind after he realized that it might be possible to win the Christian and conservative vote after all, and this happened after the Rick Warren interview.

McCain wanted Lieberman to be his VP all along.  If McCain had lost the Republican nomination he would have gone independent and taking Lieberman to be his VP at that time.  But since he won the Republican nomination he had to weigh the situation much more carefully.  If it had seemed that the Christian, pro-family, pro-life, conservative base was never going to come around, Lieberman would have been the pick.  Even after the Warren discussion numerous ‘feelers’ went out to see what the response would be to a Lieberman pick. Read the rest of this entry »

To read the comments on this entry or post one of your own go to the Comment Forum.

PETA to buy Sea World and set the creatures go?

August 22, 2008 – 9:18 pm by sntjohnny. Filed Under Blog, General.

The article.

I’m not a PETA fan by any means.  I think occasionally they do a good thing but this is usually overshadowed by the numerous silly and extreme things they do.

According to this article, PETA is angling to purchase one of the Sea World facilities and then let the animals go.  I have to say that this is an approach I approve of.  It also goes against the grain of the way the far left usually operates.  Under normal circumstances, PETA or its like would have tried to pursue legislation to outlaw such operations or to generate taxes (paid by everyone) to further their aims (uniquely theirs).  This concept of putting up their own funds to do what they think is right is a breath of fresh air.

If everyone with a liberal mindset decided to put their own money where their mouths were I suspect that they probably could get a lot done, some of which I might even find myself approving of.  For example, instead of trying to ram through labor laws such as the minimum wage, they could start their own companies, or buy companies, and then out of their own pockets pay what they think is a reasonable wage.   Assuming that a ‘reasonable wage’ is much more generous than even the ‘minimum wage’ I think that would be a decent place to work.  Perhaps other companies would model it… although there is the open question as to whether or not the company could stay afloat with such generous compensation.

I could produce other examples along the same lines.  I don’t for a minute believe that the left at large is going to abstain from trying to use the government to pursue its agenda using money taken from everyone else, but I say that when we see an outfit putting their own money where their mouth is, that is something that should be commended.

To read the comments on this entry or post one of your own go to the Comment Forum.

No Scientific Proof? Well, that proves it!

August 22, 2008 – 10:23 am by sntjohnny. Filed Under Blog, General.

I read a fascinating news article today about the worries that doctors have because some people are choosing not to get their measles immunization for their children (this could also be read:  doctors are annoyed people are challenging their judgment).  Here is the article about the jump in measles cases.

There are several parts of the article that caught my eye.

Many people are rejecting the measles shot out of concern that it might be a factor in making kids autistic.  To this, the article says, recapitulating the ‘party’ line:

Questions commonly center on autism and the fear that it can be caused by the measles shots or by a mercury-based preservative that used to be in most vaccines. Health officials say there is no good scientific proof either is a cause. [emph mine]

Well, that proves it then!  If there is no proof that the shot is a cause of autism, you are being completely irrational to suppose that nonetheless it might be.   There is no proof it is… and no proof it isn’t, either.  It is ridiculous to suppose that ones actually burdened with the decisions to provide for their welfare of the children, the parents, must wait to make those decisions for ‘good scientific proof.’  We’re still waiting for ‘good scientific proof’ that coffee is good or bad for us.  If we all waited for ‘good scientific proof’ we’d probably never do anything.  The fact is that we have to make judgment calls and doctors should be respecting that. Read the rest of this entry »

To read the comments on this entry or post one of your own go to the Comment Forum.